Gain Weight for Your Thin Body



Some of you who have a thin body may desire to gain weight. Of course this is not an easy thing, just not easy for those who want to lose weight. A thin body has very little fat and this body type not able to store fat in large amounts.
If you are trying to increase the portion of your eating to increase your weight, this is also not a good solution. If a thin body gets too much fat, the body will fail store fat. Human body metabolism will be increase drastically and will rid all new fats. A human body has ability to keep a stable fat level.
You can only gain weight of your thin body by increasing muscle mass, not gaining fat. Increasing muscle mass means you have to exercise and choosing foods that can increase muscle mass. Skinny people still have to arrange what their food and eating schedule, 5-6x a day. Eating with a frequency of 5-6x a day with a medium portion still needed to make all food absorbed by the body optimally. The portion was not too much will not make new fat discarded.
In addition to a regular diet, you should also pay attention to your sleep time, avoid sleeping too late. Caffeinated beverages, alcohol and cigarettes can also be an inhibiting factor to increase your weight. If you have a plan to increase your body weight with weight gain supplements, there is a good idea to consult with your doctor or nutritionist first.

10 steps to help you get a great night's sleep



1. Make a list of what you need to do the next day, write it all down and keep that paper and pen near your bedside in case you think of anything else you need to do. When you write things down your giving your brain the signal that it no longer needs to think about those tasks.

2. Don't watch television or listen to the radio (especially the news) before retiring for the night - and certainly do not fall asleep with the TV or radio on.

3. Read some inspirational or self-growth material for at least 30 minutes prior to bed. Your goal is to fill your mind with inspirational thoughts before falling asleep so that the last thoughts you have before drifting off are uplifting thoughts - as opposed to the stressful thoughts that most people fall asleep thinking about.

4. Make sure the room that you're sleeping in is as dark as possible - the body is made to sleep when it's dark out - the darker the room the more potential for a deep sleep.

5. Make the room as silent as possible - turn off all electric devices and ask others in the house to be as quite as they can be.
6. Don't eat for at least 3 hours before going to bed. When there's undigested food in the stomach your body is forced to focus on digesting that food rather than being focused on repairing your body and mind - which is what sleep is all about! The body was designed to digest food best while moving - not while laying down.

7. Try to go to bed at approximately 10:00 pm and awake at approximately 6:00 am. In Ayurvedic medicine it's believed that there are cycles that are the most conducive for certain activities. Going to bed at 10:00 pm and arising at 6:00 am appears to allow the body to rest the deepest, rejuvenate the most, and gives the person the most energy throughout the day.

8. Don't take drugs or vitamins/herbs that are supposed to help you sleep (unless required by your physician). Most of these artificial sleeping aids do nothing more than deaden your senses - the goal of 'sleep' is to give your body the time and means to repair itself and prepare for the coming day. When you drug yourself to sleep, every system in your body is slowed down, including all those systems that are responsible for repairing you.

9. Make sure that there's a fresh air supply in the room. The air indoors is said to be some of the most toxic air around. When you sleep, you're only able to breath in the air that surrounds you in your enclosed bedroom. Try opening a window (if it's cold outside then just open the window a crack). The fresh air that comes in while you sleep will help your body repair itself because you'll have access to cleaner, more oxygenated air.

10. That day, do 60 minutes of mild exercise. If you don't have time to do 60 minutes in a row, then break it up into 2 - 30 minute sessions, or 3 - 20 minute session, or 6 - 10 minute sessions --- just get a full 60 minutes in. The best exercise when talking about general health and preparing your body for a great night's sleep is "walking"

source

Bad Effects of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in Women



Excessive consumption of alcoholic beverages can make an impact not only bad for the health of a man, but it also gives negative effects on a woman. Bad effects of excessive alcohol consumption by women have even worse consequences than those experienced by men. The studies say that women get drunk faster and diseases caused by alcohol is easier to attack a woman.

In this health article, we will try to outline some of bad effects that can be experienced when a woman consumes excessive alcohol. We hope this health article may provide a boost for you to reduce excessive alcohol consumption, or a reference for you to do a Private Addiction Treatment.

An alcoholic woman can suffer damage in her brain, especially in cognitive neurological function. This also occurs in alcoholic men. Alcoholic women have poor test results in problem solving, planning, terms of visual memory and cognitive flexibility skills. Besides damaging the nerves of the brain, alcohol also damages the liver.

The composition of water in the body of a woman less than men, the man’s body contained 65 percent water, while only 55 percent in women’s body. With less water composition makes women more easily intoxicated when consuming alcohol. Alcohol is absorbed into the blood and then carried by water into the cell. Caused the water in the body of a woman less make alcohol concentration in blood is higher even though they drank with same amount as men.

Although liver in women is not sensitive to alcohol, but a high concentration of alcohol in their body will make a woman more easily damaged liver than men. In addition, the enzymes that convert alcohol into an inactive material contain less in a woman. If a woman and a man have a same weight given a same amount of alcohol, blood alcohol levels in women are three times higher.

A bad effect of excessive alcohol consumption can lead to malnutrition and low body resistance to disease, as well as giving a bad effect on a woman’s appearance. Consumption of alcoholic beverages for women who are pregnant will damage their baby. This will influence on children’s cognitive abilities in the future. Not only cognitive problems of children born to a mother who consumed alcohol during pregnancy, the children will also experience problems with lack of attention and reaction.

Hopefully with this health article, Bad Effects of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in Women, it can be a boost for you for a healthy life by reducing the consumption of alcohol. For those of you who are addicted to alcohol, there is a good idea to visit the alcohol rehabilitation centers, such as Luxury Alcohol Rehab or Private Drug Rehab.

First European Human Embryonic Stem Cell Trial Gets Go Ahead

The European authorities have given the go ahead for trials to treat patients with Stargardt's Macular Dystrophy (SMD) using retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). If successful, the trial may pave the way to an effective treatment not only for SMD, but also for other degenerative diseases such as dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The trial will be the first in Europe to use hESCs.

The European Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) announced today, Thursday, that it had given approval for the trials, which will begin in the next few months, to be conducted at Moorfields Eye Hospital in London, UK. They will be led by Professor James Bainbridge, who is consultant surgeon at the hospital and also Chair of Retinal Studies at University College London (UCL).

Bainbridge, a retinal surgeon, told the press:

"The ability to regenerate retinal cells from stem cells in the laboratory has been a significant advance and the opportunity to help translate such technology into new treatments for patients is hugely exciting. Testing the safety of retinal cell transplantation in this clinical trial will be an important step towards achieving this aim."

Stargardt's Macular Dystrophy (SDM) is a currently untreatable inherited eye condition that affects around 80,000 to 100,000 mostly young people in Europe and the US. It is a form ofmacular degeneration that results in progressive vision loss, and usually starts when people are in their teens. It is one of the leading causes of juvenile blindness in the world.

The patient eventually becomes blind due to degeneration of the the retinal pigment epithelium, the pigmented layer of the retina, resulting in loss of photoreceptors, the cones and rods that help us see.

The first person to be treated for the condition using RPE cells derived from stem cells was a young female patient who had already gone blind with SMD. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave the go-ahead for the US trials to start in July this year.

The European trial will be of a similar design to the US one: it will be a prospective, open-label study designed to determine the safety and tolerability of the treatment, which uses RPE cells derived from hESCs following sub-retinal transplantation to patients with advanced SMD.

The patients will receive the RPE cells via an injection into the retina. The operation will last up to an hour.

Bainbridge will be conducting the trials at the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Moorfields and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology. He said:

"There is real potential that people with blinding disorders of the retina, including Stargardt disease and age-related macular degeneration, might benefit in the future from transplantation of retinal cells."

Professor Peng Khaw, director of the biomedical research centre at Moorfields, said:

"We are delighted to be the site for these very exciting new clinical trials in stem cell therapy, which have the potential to give hope and make such a difference to the lives of people with currently untreatable blinding retinal conditions."

The biotechnology of the trial has been developed by US company Advanced Cell Technology (ACT). They have received a similar approval from the Gene Therapy Advisory Committee (GTAC), which has responsibility for the ethical oversight of proposals to conduct clinical trials involving gene or stem cell therapies in the UK.

Gary Rabin, chairman and CEO of ACT, said the European go ahead represents:

"... another important milestone for ACT and for the field of regenerative medicine."

"We are pleased that the Moorfields Eye Hospital in London has agreed to participate as a site for this study as we continue to assess the capabilities of hESC-derived RPE cells to repair the retina and reduce the impact of these devastating eye diseases," he added.

ACT has recently announced the dosing of the first patients in the US trial, both of whom have successfully undergone the transplantation surgery as outpatients.

ACT's chief scientific officer, Dr Robert Lanza, said this is the first embryonic stem cell trial that has ever been approved anywhere in the world outside the US.

"We believe that transplanting new, healthy RPE cells may provide an effective treatment for SMD and perhaps other macular degenerative diseases such as dry AMD," said Lanza.

"We are excited to start these trials in Europe, and look forward to analyzing the data we continue to collect in our ongoing trials to determine the engraftment and function of the transplanted RPE cells," he added.



source

Operation Of Gene Variant Linked To ADHD Shown By Scientists



A multinational collaboration between researchers from Spain, Mexico and Argentina revealed, that mice could provide an insight into how specific receptor subtypes in the brain could be responsible in increasing a person's risk for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and help explaining how stimulants work to treat symptoms of ADHD.
 The research was conducted by the Intramural Research Program (IRP) at the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), which is a part of the National Institutes of Health.

ADHD is associated with dysfunction of the dopamine D4 receptor subtype in addition to other disorders characterized by decreased impulse control, including drug abuse. One subtype variant of the dopamine D4 receptor, called D4.7, that has been poorly understood until now, was of particular interest to the researchers because of its higher occurrence in ADHD diagnosed patients.

Researchers inserted three variants of the dopamine D4 receptor into cells and into mice, to evaluate differences in biological activities. The study was published in today's Molecular Psychiatry and revealed, that unlike its D4.2 and D4.4 counterparts, the D4.7 variant was not able to interact with the short version of the dopamine type 2 (DS2) receptor to reduce glutamate release in the brain's region that is linked to impulsivity and ADHD symptoms in humans.

NIDA Director Dr. Nora D. Volkow said,

"Although previous studies have shown that dysfunctional dopamine D4 receptors are implicated in ADHD, this is the first study to show how this genetic difference might translate into functional deficits seen with this disorder," continuing, "Further research is needed to explore how this deficient interaction between receptors might be remedied, which could then lead to new medications for the treatment of ADHD."




Children with ADHD have difficulty in paying attention and controlling impulsive behaviors. They may be overly active which often results in poor school performance and social difficulties and also have an increased risk for substance use disorders especially if their symptoms remain untreated.

ADHD is the most commonly diagnosed neurobehavioral childhood disorder with numbers of diagnosed children continuing to rise. The National Survey of Children's Health by the Center of Disease Control showed, that from 2003 until 2007 the number of ADHD cases identified by parents of children between the ages of 4 to 17 years rose to 21.8 percent. Nearly one in 10 children of this age group was at some point diagnosed with ADHD by 2007.

66.3% percent of children currently diagnosed with ADHD received medication for their disorder. The most widely used treatment for ADHD is psychostimulant medication, but although these medicines alleviate some of the symptoms in ADHD, it is uncertain how these compounds act within the brain to do so.

Dr. Sergi Ferre, leading author of the study, said, 


"Our results suggest that psychostimulants might reduce glutamate release by amplifying this D4/D2S interaction. These results might also explain why these medications are less efficient in patients with the D4.7 variant."




The study was the result of a multinational collaboration between researchers at the NIDA IRP, institutes in Spain (the University of Barcelona, the Autonomous University of Barcelona and the University of Navarra), Mexico (the National Polytechnic Institute), and Argentina (the National Council of Scientific and Technical Research). For more information please visit: http://www.nature.com/mp/index.html.

More information on the use of stimulants to treat ADHD can be found here.

Link to further information on ADHD symptoms, its causes, treatments and how to get help and cope with the disorder.

TV Watching That Exceeds Six Hours A Day Can Reduce Life By Up To 5 Years







Research published online in the British Journal of Sports Medicine suggests, watching television for approximately six hours daily could shorten the viewers life expectancy by almost five years. Competing with other well known behavioral risk factors, such as smoking and not enough exercise, the investigation indicates.

Sedentary behavior (as distinct from too little exercise) is linked with a increased risk of death, especially from heart attack orstroke. Watching TV makes up for a huge amount of sedentary activity, but its impact on life expectancy has not been evaluated, say the researchers.

To assemble a lifetime risk framework, researchers used previously published information on the connection between TV viewing time and death from analyses of the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab), together with Australian national population and mortality figures for 2008.

Including over 11,000 adults aged 25 or older, and beginning in 1999-2000, AusDiab is a national survey of a representative sample of the population.

The researchers then created a risk framework for the Australian population in 2008, based upon answers those participating in the survey had provided, when questioned about the total time they spent in the previous week watching TV or videos.

In 2008 it was estimated that Australian adults (25 years and over) watched 9.8 billion hours of TV, which led them to calculate that each hour of TV watched after the age of 25 reduced the life expectancy of the viewer by just under 22 minutes.

The researchers calculated based on these figures, that in comparison to someone who does not watch TV, those who spend a lifetime average of over six hours daily watching television can expect to live just under 5 years less.

These figures compare with additional well known lifestyle risk factors of death from cardiovascular disease after the age of 50, including physical activity and obesity.

According to the researchers risk framework other investigations, for example, have shown the lifelong smoking is connected with the shortening of life expectancy by over 4 years after the age of 50, with the average loss of life from each cigarette calculated to be 11 minutes - the same as half an hour of watching TV.

The researchers say their findings indicate that substantial loss of life may be linked with prolonged TV viewing. Also adding,

"While we used Australian data, the effects in other industrialized and developing countries are likely to be comparable, given the typically large amounts of time spent watching TV and similarities in disease patterns."


They conclude,
If these [figures] are confirmed and shown to reflect a causal association, TV viewing is a public health problem comparable in size to established behavioral risk factors."

Researchers Find Gene Behind Elephant Man's Disfigurement


Researchers have identified a gene variant in the rare tissue and bone overgrowth disorder Proteus syndrome that may confirm the cause of the severe disfigurement suffered by "Elephant Man", a 19th century Englishman whom experts believe may have had the disease. Called AKT1, the gene may be a target for future therapies, bringing hope to patients and their families. You can read a scientific paper about its discovery in the 27 July early online issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

The study was led by the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), part of the National Institutes of Health, in the United States. NHGRI Director, Dr Eric D. Green, told the press that:
"This study resolves a daunting challenge in clinical genetics and offers hope for patients with Proteus syndrome."

"This rare disorder has been the focus of curiosity and medical observation for decades but until now has never been biologically explained. With the analysis reported here, patients and families who face this condition have hope for future therapies."

Proteus syndrome is a rare disorder where tissue and bone grow hugely out of proportion (Proteus is the name of the Greek god who could transform his shape). It is so rare estimates suggest there may be as few as 500 people around the world with the disorder, although it could be more, because the condition is very difficult to diagnose.

In this study, the researchers found that a single "point mutation" in the DNA of the AKT1 gene activates the sporadic tissue growth that characterizes Proteus syndrome. A point mutation is the equivalent of spelling one word differently in a large volume of text.

Proteus syndrome came to the public's attention in the 1980s through Davind Lynch's film "The Elephant Man", where John Hurt plays the part of Joseph (called John in the film) Merrick, a severely deformed Londoner discovered performing in a Victorian freak show.
Experts believe Merrick may have had the disorder, and the team behind this study are planning to test DNA recovered from his skeleton to find out. Merrick died in 1890 in what is now the Royal London Hospital, where his skeleton has been preserved as part of the hospital's pathology collection.

But that will not be straightforward, because of something quite rare known as "genetic mosaicism", of which the AKT1 mutation is an example. In genetic mosaicism, the individual essentially harbours two genomes, such that a subset of the body's cells has a different genome to the rest. The AKT1 mutation behind Proteus syndrome is in one genome but not the other, so if you took biopsy samples from a person with Proteus syndrome, you could inadvertently only sample cells featuring the genome without the mutation, and conclude it wasn't present.

The AKT1 mutation in Proteus syndrome occurs spontaneously while the embryo is developing. It is not like genes that cause inherited diseases, where the mutation is passed on through the sperm or the egg. Also, the severity of the disease depends on when the "spelling mistake" occurs in a single cell in the embryo. All cells descended from that cell then inherit the mutation, and that is how the individual ends up with two genomes: the "normal" one and the one containing the mutation.

When a baby carrying the AKT1 mutation is born, he or she will appear normal at first, but during the first two years of life, the symptoms of Proteus syndrome will start showing themselves, as more and more cells with the mutation divide according to growth "rules" that are unlike those of the cells carrying the "normal" genome. Thus some parts of the child's body will start to grow and deform, sometimes massively out of proportion, while the rest of the body grows normally. This gets worse as the person gets older, and also makes them more vulnerable to tumors.

So far, the only way to diagnose the syndrome has been by observing these signs and symptoms. As well as abnormal growth, the condition causes skin lesions and thickening of the soles of the feet. Some patients also develop neurological problems, some have mental retardation, some can lose their sight.

Senior author Dr Leslie Biesecker, chief of Genetic Diseases Research at NHGRI, said they have great difficulty diagnosing Proteus syndrome, but this molecular discovery should really help conduct diagnoses more objectively, especially in patients with "perplexing forms of overgrowth".

For the study, Biesecker and colleagues scanned the "exomes" of seven patients with Proteus syndrome. The exome is that part of the genome that controls protein production, and contains less than 2% of the 3 billion "letters" in the "text" of a whole genome, making searching for a single letter gene mutation much easier.
When they found the AKT1 mutation, they then confirmed it by scanning another 20 affected patients and showed it was present in more than 90% of them. However, the researchers suspect that the ones that did not appear to carry the mutation could actually have it, but at a low level, or perhaps, because of the genetic mosaicism, the tissue samples they gave happened to contain only cells with the "normal" genome.

They also tested this the other way around: by sampling people without the syndrome. In a random study population of more than 400 individuals, not one was found to be carrying the AKT1 mutation. And neither was it present in thousands of DNA sequences stored in public genome research databases.

The gene AKT1 is an oncogene, known to cause uncontrolled growth in cancer. The mutation present in Proteus syndrome is part of a cascade of mutations that foster metastasis, where cancer cells migrate from the primary tumor to seed new tumors in other parts of the body. AKT1 mutations have been found in about 2% of cancers. Biesecker said if the mutation that occurs in Proteus syndrome were to occur very early in the development of the embryo, it would affect so many cells of the body that it would be unlikely that a person could survive for long.

The researchers found that the AKT1 mutation in Proteus syndrome is an accelerator of cell growth. Stopping its activity should then stop the overgrowth activity of the protein.
Biesecker said: "We now have a better chance of making or finding a drug that can arrest this overgrowth and begin to use it early on in the disease progression."

"A factor in our favor is that it is much easier to find a drug that inhibits the activity of a protein, which is what we want to do with AKT in Proteus syndrome, than to activate a protein," he explained. "A Mosaic Activating Mutation in AKT1 Associated with the Proteus Syndrome."

Marjorie J. Lindhurst, Julie C. Sapp, Jamie K. Teer, Jennifer J. Johnston, Erin M. Finn, and others.

NEJM, online first 27 July 2011; doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1104017

Additional source: NIH.

World Hepatitis Day: Call To Action


Yesterday, Thursday 28 July, is World Hepatitis Day, marking the need to increase awareness of viral hepatitis and the diseases it causes, and prompting calls for action urging people to get tested and immunized and help stop new infections.


Thelma King Thiel, the CEO and chairman of Hepatitis Foundation International, said in a statement issued from the organization's US headquarters in Silver Spring, Maryland, earlier today that: "We have the power to prevent new hepatitis infections and we need people to take action."


Ways to prevent hepatitis infection include immunization, avoiding risky behaviors such as sharing needles, toothbrushes and razors, and encouraging people at risk to get infected, said Thiel.


Hepatitis means inflammation of the liver, and there are several causes, including drugs, alcohol, autoimmune disorders, and viruses. There are many viruses that result in liver inflammation, but the term viral hepatitis refers primarily to viruses that attack the liver directly, such as the most common types, A, B, and C.


The burden of hepatitis worldwide that is attributable to these three types of virus is huge. Estimates from Hepatitis Foundation International suggest:

· Every year, 1.4 million people find out they have hepatitis A.

· 2 billion people worldwide are infected with hepatitis B.

· 130 million people worldwide are chronically infected with hepatitis C.

In the US, thanks to increased awareness and improved hygiene, cases of hepatitis A have reduced dramatically, but chronic hepatitis C and hepatitis B infections continue to persist.


Also, because it can take many years, decades even, for symptoms to emerge, it is estimated that up to 75% of Americans that are infected don't realize it, and therefore are not receiving the care and treatment they need, according to a statement made recently by the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).


Two months ago, in May 2011, the DHHS, issued its action plan "Combating the Silent Epidemic: US Department of Health and Human Services Action Plan for the Prevention, Care and Treatment of Viral Hepatitis", to address what it describes as a "silent epidemic" affecting between 3.5 and 5.3 million Americans.


The DHHS says that the problem of many infected people not realizing they are infected is made worse by the fact that health care providers, through lack of training, don't have the skills or tools to assess the risks, offer prevention counselling, or diagnose and treat viral hepatitis. Assistant Secretary for Health, Howard K Koh, said the action plan, which he describes as "unprecendented", is a call to action for better education, treatment and prevention.


Dr Thomas R Frieden, Director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), said the action needed can't be accomplished by one government agency alone, it needs everyone across government to work together to take "prevention efforts to the next level".


"Far too many Americans are unaware of the serious impact of viral hepatitis and the devastating consequences that can result from leaving it untreated. The time for action is now," he urged.


In their message earlier today, Hepatitis Foundation International reinforced the urgency of this message, and especially the need to "identify the large at-risk population of Baby Boomers, who are likely unaware of their infection". They urge people to take the following steps to prevent hepatitis and save their liver:

1. Get tested: contact your local public health department or your doctor to find out how.

2. Get vaccinated: hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccines are available.

3. Get educated: learn the value of your liver, how it is key to health, avoid drugs and alcohol and limit intake of fatty and unhealthy foods.


Sources: HFI, DHHS.

Human Brain Shrinks With Age, While Chimp Brain Does Not


Unlike the brain of our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees, particular parts of our human brain shrink in volume as we age, probably as an evolutionary consequence of our longer lifespan, suggest US researchers who report how they used MRI scans of chimps' brains to arrive at their findings in an early online issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences published on 25 July 2011.

First author Dr Chet C. Sherwood, associate professor of anthropology at George Washington University's Columbian College of Arts and Sciences, told the press that:

"Although other animals experience some cognitive impairment and brain atrophy as they age, it appears that human aging is marked by more dramatic degeneration."

To investigate how this might relate to brain size, they set out, in the first study of its kind in this field, to compare total and regional brain volume of chimps at different ages with that of humans.

But as there appears to be a gap in data available on chimps' brains, the researchers used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure brain volumes in a cross-sectional sample of 99 adult chimpanzee brains aged from 10 to 51 years.

The researchers measured total brain volume and the volume of certain regions, including: total neocortical gray matter, total neocortical white matter, frontal lobe gray matter, frontal lobe white matter, and the hippocampus.

They then compared these measurements with brain structure volumes measured in 87 adult humans aged from 22 to 88 years.

They found that while the volume of brain structures in chimpanzees did not change much as they aged, there was a decline in the sizes of all the brain structures measured in humans.

Further analysis ("using an iterative age-range reduction procedure") showed that the strongest effects in humans came from those individuals who were older than the maximum longevity of chimpanzees (in the wild, few chimps live past their 45th birthday).

"Thus, we conclude that the increased magnitude of brain structure shrinkage in human aging is evolutionarily novel and the result of an extended lifespan," write the researchers.

The team were particulary interested in the hippocampus, because this is particularly vulnerable to age-related degeneration in humans. Among other things, the hippocampus encodes new memories and helps with spatial navigation. It is an area of the human brain that suffers the most damage in Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Affecting mostly older people, Alzheimer's is the result of gradual loss of the structure and function, and also death, of brain cells or neurons. Chimps don't get the disease.

Perhaps humans are vulnerable to Alzheimer's disease because we have more pronounced brain atrophy than other species, including our close relatives, even when we age normally and healthily, said the researchers.

Humans have evolved to possess a large brain and a very long lifespan:

"While there are certainly benefits to both of these adaptations, it seems that more intense decline in brain volume in the elderly of our species is a cost," commented Sherwood.

"Aging of the cerebral cortex differs between humans and chimpanzees."
Chet C. Sherwood, Adam D. Gordon, John S. Allen, Kimberley A. Phillips, Joseph M. Erwin, Patrick R. Hof, and William D. Hopkins.
PNAS published ahead of print July 25, 2011, doi:10.1073/pnas.1016709108
Link to Abstract.

Additional sources: George Washington University.

Hope For Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Patients Using A Targeted Antisense Therapy



AVI-4658, a targeted antisense therapy to restore expression of dystrophin, a key protein which patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy lack, shows promise, researchers from the Neuromuscular Centre, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK, wrote in the journal The Lancet.

Professor Francesco Muntoni and team wrote that approximately 1 in every 3,500 British males has Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The patient's muscle cells break down and are lost, leading to progressive muscle weakness. By the time the boy is between the age of 8 and 12 years he can no longer walk. By the time they reach late adolescence or early adulthood their condition has deteriorated so much that many die.

AVI-4658 might be an effective treatment for a considerable number of patients.

This open-label, phase 2, dose-escalation study with 19 patients was carried out at three centers - Great Ormond Street Hospital, or Children NHS Trust (GOSH), both in London, and the Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, England.

When treatment was completed, a muscle biopsy was taken from each child. The team discovered that the patients' ability to produce functional mRNA through "exon skipping' was repaired with the use of AVI-4658 - eventually allowing them to manufacture functional dystrophin protein.

The researchers said:

"Seven patients had a significant dose response, six of whom were in the two high-dose cohorts, showing restoration of dystrophin protein expression up to 18% of normal levels."

They concluded:

"On the basis of our data and recent preclinical data, we expect that extended administration of AVI-4658 at doses of 10 mg/kg or higher will result in sufficient dystrophin expression to have a positive effect on the prevention of muscle degeneration in Duchenne muscular dystrophy... AVI-4658 has the potential to ameliorate the progressive natural history of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and now needs to be investigated in clinical efficacy trials." Comment in the same journal Dr Akinori Nakamura, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan, and Dr Shin'ichi Takeda, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan, wrote:

"The regulatory and practical (ie, scaling up) barriers to clinical use of exon-skipping therapy are much less daunting than those for gene therapy with viral vectors or cell transplantation therapy. Therefore, successful clinical trials of exon skipping therapy in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy could have a great effect on development of treatments for other intractable hereditary neuromuscular disorders."

"Exon skipping and dystrophin restoration in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy after systemic phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer treatment: an open-label, phase 2, dose-escalation study"
Sebahattin Cirak*, Virginia Arechavala-Gomeza*, Michela Guglieri, Lucy Feng, Silvia Torelli, Karen Anthony, Stephen Abbs, Maria Elena Garralda, John Bourke, Dominic J Wells, George Dickson, Matthew J A Wood, Steve D Wilton, Volker Straub, Ryszard Kole, Stephen B Shrewsbury, Caroline Sewry, Jennifer E Morgan, Kate Bushby, Francesco Muntoni
The Lancet July 25, 2011. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60756-3

Asthma Risk Lower In Breastfed Babies


Babies fed only on breast milk up to the age of six months have a lower risk of developing asthma-related symptoms in early childhood, and this appears to be independent of infectious and allergic diseases, according to a study by researchers at the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam in The Netherlands that was published early online recently in the European Respiratory Journal. The researchers said their findings add support to the idea that babies in industrialized countries should be given only breast milk up to the age of six months. The research is part of the Generation R Study, which is following thousands of multi-ethnic urban children from before birth until early adulthood, to identify early environmental and genetic causes of normal and abnormal growth, development and health. Although other studies have already linked breastfeeding to asthma risk, the researchers said their findings are the first to show a link between duration of breastfeeding and number of wheezing periods. They also found that asthma-related symptoms appear earlier in children who are breastfed for fewer months or who are also given other milk or solids earlier (in the first four months). The researchers used questionnaire-gathered data to look at the effect of breastfeeding duration and the introduction of other liquid and solid food on 5,368 children. The data told them whether the children had been breastfed in their first 12 months of life, when they stopped having breast milk, and whether they were given any other milk or solids, and if so, when. Another set of data came from questionnaires filled in later, when the children reached 1, 2, 3 and 4 years of age. This told them about diseases and illnesses, including asthma-related symptoms such as wheezing, shortness of breath, dry cough and persistent phlegm. The results showed that: Compared to children who were breastfed for 6 months or more, children who had never received breast milk had an increased risk of wheezing, shortness of breath, dry cough and persistent phlegm in their first 4 years. The strongest associations were with persistent phlegm (children who were never breastfed had 1.5 times higher risk of this symptom), and wheezing (1.4 times higher risk if never breastfed).
Being fed solids or other milk as well as breast milk during the first four months were linked to higher risk of wheezing, shortness of breath, dry cough and persistent phlegm in preschool years compared to having only breast milk in the first four months.
Adjusting for potential influencers, the links between breastfeeding and asthma-related symptoms could not be explained by eczema, but partly by lower respiratory tract infections. The researchers concluded that: "Shorter duration and non-exclusivity of breastfeeding were associated with increased risks of asthma-related symptoms in preschool children. These associations seemed at least partly explained by infectious but not by atopic mechanisms." Lead author Dr Agnes Sonnenschein-van der Voort, who also works in the Department of Paediatrics in the Division of Respiratory Medicine at the Erasmus Center, told the press that although more studies should be done to look at whether breastfeeding protects against asthma later in life: "These results support current health policy strategies that promote exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months in industrialised countries." "Duration and exclusiveness of breastfeeding and childhood asthma-related symptoms." A.M.M. Sonnenschein-van der Voort, V.V.W. Jaddoe, R.J.P. van der Valk, S.P. Willemsen, A. Hofman, H.A. Moll, J.C. de Jongste, and L. Duijts Eur Respir J erj01781-2010; published ahead of print 20 July 2011: doi:10.1183/09031936.00178110 Additional source: European Lung Foundation.

‪3D Medical Animation - What is Cancer

Stop Using Blood Tests For TB Say WHO


Using blood tests to diagnose active tuberculosis (TB) often leads to misdiagnosis, say the World Health Organization (WHO), who urge all countries to stop using the tests and rely instead on accurate WHO-recommended microbiological or molecular tests.

This is the first time the global health agency has issued a "negative" policy recommendation relating to TB, something they say "underscores the Organization's determination" to advise governments when there is strong evidence that widespread practice is doing more harm than good.The WHO's new policy recommendation, released from its headquarters in Geneva on Wednesday, states that the currently available commercial blood (serological) tests are unreliable and inaccurate. This is because they look for antibodies or antigens in the blood, which is a notoriously difficult thing to do. Sometimes these blood tests don't find antibodies in patients who have active TB and return a negative result, and sometimes they find antibodies to other diseases that are mistaken for TB antibodies and return a positive result. Using blood tests to test for active TB is "bad practice" that leads to misdiagnosis, mistreatment and potential harm to public health, say the WHO.Dr Mario Raviglione, Director of the Stop TB Department at the WHO, said:"In the best interests of patients and caregivers in the private and public health sectors, WHO is calling for an end to the use of these serological tests to diagnose tuberculosis.""A blood test for diagnosing active TB disease is bad practice. Test results are inconsistent, imprecise and put patients' lives in danger," he added.The agency pointed out that the new policy recommendation only applies to blood tests for active TB. They are in the process of reviewing the blood tests for inactive TB, which is also referred to as dormant or latent TB.The new policy recommendation follows 12 months of analysis of evidence by the WHO and global experts on TB, who evaluated 94 studies, including 67 for pulmonary TB. The "overwhelming" evidence from these studies showed that the blood tests return an unacceptable level of either false positives or false negatives, compared to tests recommended by the WHO.For example, many of the studies found that the commercial blood tests had "low sensitivity" and returned negative results when they should have been positive. This means patients who think they are in the clear don't get treated and there is a greater risk they will pass on the disease, or even die from untreated TB.The evidence also showed that the commercial blood tests have "low specificity", which means too many patients receive a positive result, indicating they have active TB, when they do not. This results in them being treated for an illness they don't have, and perhaps more alarmingly, not being diagnosed or treated for an illness they do have, which could be serious and even fatal.And it's not as though these tests are cheap: many patients pay as much as 30 US dollars per test, of which there are 18 different brands, mostly made in Europe and the US, not approved by any regulatory body, and sold in a global market where more than a million are carried out every year to test for active TB.As Dr Karin Weyer, WHO Stop TB Department's Coordinator of TB Diagnostics and Laboratory Strengthening, explained:"Blood tests for TB are often targeted at countries with weak regulatory mechanisms for diagnostics, where questionable marketing incentives can override the welfare of patients.""It's a multi-million dollar business centred on selling substandard tests with unreliable results," she added.Every year, 1.7 million people die of TB. It is the number one killer of people withHIV. Improving the diagnosis of TB is a priority for the WHO and the community that is fighting TB worldwide. Researchers are currently working on ways to make better, faster, more accurate tests that are easier to administer, said the WHO.Source: WHO.

Falls, Eye Tests May Hint at Early Alzheimer's

PARIS (Reuters) - People at risk for Alzheimer's are twice as likely to fall as healthy people, and the disease might also be visible in scans of the eye, researchers said on Sunday.

The preliminary results, presented at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference in Paris, are part of a widespread search for ways to detect Alzheimer's before memory problems begin, when drugs and treatments might have a better chance of making a difference.

"I don't think we can wait until people develop Alzheimer's disease or mild Alzheimer's. I think we need to act before that," Dr. William Klunk of the Alzheimer Disease Research Center at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center said at the conference.

Brain scans and spinal fluid tests are used by researchers to detect Alzheimer's-related changes, but they are expensive and impractical for widespread screening, and none of them have been approved for routine use.

So teams are looking for other early changes that offer evidence the disease is developing before symptoms occur.Susan Stark of Washington University in St. Louis looked to see whether frequent falls may be an early warning sign of Alzheimer's disease.Her team studied 125 people who had brain scans and contributed samples of their spinal fluid. Each study participant kept a journal of how many times they fell over an eight-month period.The researchers found that people whose brain scans detected pre-symptomatic Alzheimer's disease were twice as likely to fall as those who had normal scans.

"This is really the first study that tests for falls in the preclinical phases of Alzheimer's disease," Stark said."It suggests that higher rates of falls can occur very early in the disease process."

In a separate study, Shaun Frost, a researcher from the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Australia's national science agency, looked to see whether changes in the retina at the back of the eye—which is closely related to the brain—could be used to detect early Alzheimer's disease."It is much easier for us to image the retina than it is for us to do a brain scan," Frost told the meeting.

Frost's team found the width of certain blood vessels were significantly different in people with early signs of Alzheimer's disease compared with healthy people.People in the small study who had abnormal blood vessels in their eye also had plaque deposits of an Alzheimer's-related protein known as beta amyloid on positron emission tomography, or PET brain scans.

"These findings are indicating a relationship between changes in the retina and the plaque burden in the brain," Frost said.He said the study suggested it might be possible to use retina tests along with other biomarker tests to detect Alzheimer's early.The study needs to be confirmed by larger studies, but it shows one of the ways in which researchers are trying to find ways of diagnosing Alzheimer's early.Even though there are no treatments that can halt or delay the disease, scientists say knowing how to diagnose Alzheimer's before symptoms occur will be important when new drugs become available.

What is Osteopathy?


Many forms of natural medicine have been floating around in the ears of the public lately, like Ayurvedic practices, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Herbalism, and Chiropractics, but one form has yet to pop up as a popular topic of conversation: Osteopathy.

Osteopathy is a form of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) that focuses on the patient and emphasizes the role of the musculoskeletal system—the bones, muscles, cartilage, ligaments, and joints that provide the movement, support, and stability for the human body—for staying healthy.

This alternative healthcare modality offers a holistic approach to medicine by relying on the body’s own restorative powers through manipulation of the muscular structure. Like a general practitioner in Western medicine, Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine (DO’s) are fully licensed physicians and can also be surgeons, depending on their amount of education.

Founded by Civil War surgeon, Dr. Andrew Still, who thought the best way to fight disease was to stimulate the immune system through natural causes. Late in the 1800s, Dr. Still abandoned his Western medical roots and rallied against popular techniques at the time like using leeches for blood removal.

Though unpopular at the time and turned against by colleagues in his profession, Dr. Still pressed on and developed a new form of science using the body’s tissues and fluids as manipulation tools. Dr. Still’s new science ideas were turned into the division of natural health called Osteopathy that is still very much alive today.

Dr. Still’s techniques were strengthened by the ability to find the natural rhythms of a person’s spinal cord which keeps breathing at a normal pace and stimulates the connective tissues all over the body that control the movement and tension of muscles and a person’s limbs in order to ensure comfortable and needed flexibility.

Most of the ailments treated by osteopathy are physical, as they have to deal with tension or pain within the musculoskeletal structure.The thoughts behind this branch of natural medicine, along with most of the sections of CAM, deal with the conjunction of treating both the body and the mind, treating the body through the mind or vice versa. DO’s and CAM doctors often feel that the mind and body both work together equally to solve a problem within the body.

From babies to grandparents, osteopathy has worked for a range of symptoms. Infants with a tendency for colic, trouble with digestion, spitting up, learning disorders, and cerebral palsy have been helped by osteopathic treatments.From serious pain issues to smaller uncomfortable pains, everything from neck and back problems, joint pain, sciatica, headaches, asthma, and allergy symptoms can be relieved through osteopathy, as well as neurological problems like seizures, sinusitis, and even digestive track conditions.Expectation of a quick fix may disappoint.

This is not Western medicine, with its pills, shots and conventional treatments. With osteopathy challenging the body to control itself and allowing healing to be started from the inside out, might take awhile depending on your body. Your immune system would have to be re-taught and pumped up in order for drastic changes to take place.

In terms of a timeline, there is no direct answer but acute problems will have an easier time leaving than a chronic condition that has been living in the body longer.Popular former United States presidents and important political figures FDR, Eisenhower, and JFK all relied on osteopathic services for their health needs, among many other famous figures then and now.

While breaking the cycle of relying on doctors to heal us instead of listening to our bodies takes time, at least we are not solely looking to leeches for help. To find a DO in your area,look to The CranialAcademy to help your body heal itself through mental and physical osteopathic techniques.

Great Workouts in an Hour (or Less!)


As a fitness professional, I’m frequently asked questions about how to create the “best” workout. It seems that we’re constantly bombarded with conflicting information on how to achieve the body of our dreams. Is cardio the best way to blast fat, or is greater lean body mass through strength training the key? How much time should we be devoting to exercise to see and feel a difference? Should we stick with a routine, or try new and different things?

The answer is quite simple. A great workout combines cardio, strength training, and core work, keeps you moving at all times, and can be done in less than an hour. The key is to keep moving. When you’re fatigued from one set of exercises, quickly move on to the next. This is an active recovery technique that helps burn more calories, and it can be implemented in a variety of ways. If you’re in the gym, aim for a circuit of 3-4 strength training exercises in 5-10 minutes, then move on to core work for 2-3 minutes, then switch to cardio for 5-10 minutes. If you’re exercising outdoors, try to push yourself more during shorter cardio segments. When you need a break, try to do squats, lunges, push-ups and tricep dips until you’re ready to resume your cardio.

If you’re feeling out of breath, slow down and focus more on core work. If your arms are really tired, try some cardio to give your upper body a break. The more variety you can bring to the workout, the better. Listen to your body and take breaks when you need them, and stop if you feel faint, sick, or dizzy.

A dynamic workout that incorporates lots of different movements is the best way to fight both mental and physical boredom and fatigue, and you’ll find that switching up your routine actually challenges you more. You’ll be more likely to push through plateaus and work harder if you commit to short bursts of more challenging exercises. Instead of running on the treadmill for long periods of time, try to break your cardio up into 3-5 minute bursts. You’ll be more likely to push yourself if you know you’ll be moving on to something new in a few short minutes.

Two useful tools to help you monitor the quality of your workout are a heart rate monitor and your own rate of perceived exertion. A heart rate monitor tracks how many calories you burn during your workout, so you can actually see the effects of the exercises you’re doing, and increase your efforts as needed. It’s a great way to see just how well a circuit training workout can be. By asking yourself how challenged you are, on a scale of 1-10, you can keep yourself honest about how you’re feeling. Begin by rating yourself during your current workout routine. Check in with yourself frequently on a scale of 1-10 and track the calories expended with your monitor. Aim to increase your own personal number by 1-2 levels, and try to increase the calories burned each time. Proceed slowly, and be mindful of how you feel 24-48 hours post-workout. If you feel reasonably sore, you’re on the right track. If you can barely move, you’ve probably pushed it a bit too far and should scale back, and if you don’t feel anything, try to push it a bit more during your next session.

As far as total time devoted to your workouts, try to set reasonable expectations. Each week, take a look at your calendar, reserve time in your schedule for exercise, and make it a priority. Fifty-five minutes is ideal and should include strength training moves to work your upper and lower body, lots of mat work for the core, and intense, challenging cardio bursts. If you only have 30 minutes, make it a challenging, fast-paced workout rather than skipping it because it’s not “enough.” Some exercise is always better than none at all, and you’re worth it!

Lisa Corsello is an ACE Certified Personal Trainer, nutrition consultant and group fitness instructor who works with clients to create customized, goal-oriented exercise and nutrition plans. She works with a wide range of clients, from absolute beginners needing basic knowledge, enthusiasts who want to increase lean body mass and reduce body fat, people recovering from sports injuries or serious illness, and professional athletes in training.

New Vaccine Approved for Upcoming Flu Season


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has announced approval of the influenza vaccine formulation for the 2011-2012 flu season. The vaccine formulation protects against the three virus strains that surveillance indicates will be most common during the upcoming season and includes the same virus strains used in 2010-2011 (influenza A H3N2 virus, influenza B virus, and the 2009 H1N1 virus.).

Six manufacturers have been licensed to provide the vaccine throughout the United States: CSL Limited, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, BiomedicalCorporation, MedImmune Vaccines Inc., Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Limited, and Sanofi Pasteur Inc. (Sanofi Pastuer Inc. will also be producing and distributinga transdermal version of the vaccine that will be available for 18 to 64 year olds, approved separately on May 9, 2011.) Production of the vaccine will get underway shortly and be ready in time for the fall/winter flu season.

Vaccination remains the cornerstone of preventing influenza,a contagious respiratory disease caused by influenza virus strains. According to the FDA press release, between 5 percent and 20 percent of the U.S. population develops influenza each year, leading to more than 200,000 hospitalizations from related complications. Influenza-related deaths vary yearly, ranging from a low of about 3,000 to a high of 49,000 people.

The Centers for Disease Control consider the annual flu a “serious and contagious disease.” It can lead to hospitalization and death, and while they do not expect a repeat performance of the 2009 pandemic, the flu is unpredictable and it is wise to take precautions to avoid the contagion.The CDC urges you to take the following actions to protect yourself and others from influenza:
Vaccination : Everyone 6 months of age and older should get vaccinated against the flu. Children younger than 6 months are at high risk of serious flu illness, but are too young to be vaccinated. People who care for them should be vaccinated instead.

Prevention : Wash your hands often and avoid touching your eyes, nose and mouth. Germs spread this way. Cover your nose and mouth with a tissue or the crook of your elbow when you cough or sneeze. Try to avoid contact with people who are sick.

Follow-Through : Get a prescription for and take the whole dosage of antiviral medication. Antiviral drugs can make illness milder and prevent serious flu complications.

5 Nutrition and Weight Loss Misconceptions


With all of the diet and weight loss information out there, it’s hard to know what will work for us. It seems that there is a always a new and better way to lose weight and keep it off. What really works, and why? Here are the most common misconceptions about diet, nutrition and weight loss.

1. Carbs are bad

Contrary to popular belief, carbs are essential to a balanced and healthy diet and maintaining energy levels. Simple carbs, those that are high in refined sugar (soda, candy, etc.), are bad for us. Eating whole grains, fruits and vegetables is actually really important to overall health, fitness and improving the way you look and feel.

2. Non-fat is better than low-fat


Many non-fat products are full of refined sugar and salt to make them taste better. Small amounts of fat are actually really important. Fat helps us feel fuller longer, making us less likely to overeat.
3. I can eat anything I want if I work out.

Remember that losing weight means burning more calories than are consumed. Working out is a great way to burn calories during and even after the workout. However, most of us tend to overestimate how many calories we burn during our workouts. We also underestimate how many calories are in the food we eat. If you’re burning 350 calories during your workout and downing a cheeseburger, fries and a coke afterwards, you might actually gain weight! Try a heart rate monitor to get a good idea of how many calories you’re burning, and check online to see how many calories are in your favorite foods

.4. If I’m good all week, I can “splurge” on the weekend

While it might feel really great to eat healthy foods and work out all week, try not to overdo it when you let loose. A few days of taking in too many calories leads to weight gain, regardless of how good you’ve been all week. Try to enjoy yourself in moderation throughout the week so you’re less likely to go overboard.

5. Eating less will help “shrink my stomach”

Going for long periods of time without food slows metabolism, confuses the body, and usually leads to eventual overeating. The body needs good, healthy food on a consistent basis to burn calories efficiently. Eating regularly can actually help weight loss.

Lisa Corsello is an ACE Certified Personal Trainer, nutrition consultant and group fitness instructor who works with clients to create customized, goal-oriented exercise and nutrition plans. She works with a wide range of clients, from absolute beginners needing basic knowledge, enthusiasts who want to increase lean body mass and reduce body fat, people recovering from sports injuries or serious illness, and professional athletes in training.

The Bigger the Fork, the Smaller the Waistline


Although the preconceived notion is to think in terms of reduced food portions on small plates when it comes to maintaining a healthy weight, sometimes bigger really is better, especially when it comes to the of fork you choose to eat with.According to a new study conducted by researchers from the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, people who used an oversized fork to take bigger bites when eating out actually ate less than those who consumed their meal using a fork that was smaller than normal.

The findings of the analysis were recently published in the online edition of the Journal of ConsumerResearch.For the research team to arrive at their findings, it was a case of “buon appetito” and we’ll do the rest, with the help of a local Italian restaurant. Over a two-day period, during which two lunches and two dinners were served as part of the analysis, the researchers selected tables at random to receive either forks that were 20 percent larger than those normally used by the restaurant, or forks that were 20 percent smaller than were normally used.

Each plate of food served was weighed both prior to being carried to the table, and upon its return to the kitchen, which allowed the amount of food eaten by each person to be calculated. The surprising results revealed that those patrons who were given larger forks ate less overall, leaving more food on their plates by the end of their meal than did those using the smaller forks. This left University of Utah researchers Arul Mishra, Himanshu Mishra, and Tamara M. Masters with the task of explaining why those who received bigger bites of food actually consumed less than did those who ate smaller bites.Their conclusions?

First, the diners are visually aware of whether they are making progress in diminishing the amount of food seen on their plates in their effort to achieve satiation of their hunger. The use of a smaller fork gives the appearance that less progress has been made in achieving their goal, while the use of a larger fork provides for the appearance of a more adequate amount of food having been consumed from the plate.In addition, those who eat with smaller forks feel the need to further their efforts in achieving hunger satisfaction by eating more forkfuls of food, which results in their actual consumption of more than an adequate amount of food.

After reaching their conclusions, the research team tested them by varying the portions of food served to the restaurant patrons. They discovered that among diners who were served larger portions, those using smaller forks ate significantly more than those using larger forks. However, when served smaller portions, the of the fork used by the diners had no affect the amount of food they consumed.The study authors acknowledged that their findings only hold true for people who are eating out.

The results are not necessarily applicable to people eating at home because their goals for satisfying hunger may differ from those of restaurant patrons.The researchers also advised that to avoid overeating, people need to learn how to better recognize and understand their own personal hunger cues, and determine how much food they actually need to eat. Then, use your best judgment and buon appetito!